- open architectures
- embedded API management
- data orchestration capabilities
- integrated analytics
- agnosticism to tools, infrastructures and standards
In addition, the research and development costs of trying to be all things to all people were so high that only a mass market could sustain it. This mass market has been slow to mature and unpredictable, which has led many vendors to invest large amounts of money in the wrong things.
There are so many inexpensive and powerful tools for developing mobile apps today, that the competitive advantages of having one as a core component of your MADP is minimal. The cross-platform app development capability of many MADPs remains valuable, but the efforts of keeping one updated and relevant is cost prohibitive.
I continue to believe there is a huge market, and many opportunities for vendors to make money as a result of companies embracing enterprise mobility, but perhaps not in the areas first imagined. The investments may be directed more toward updating and replacing existing infrastructures and systems to be mobile-centric and capable of supporting real-time data exchanges. The actual investment in the development and integration of mobile apps may be relatively small compared to these infrastructure investments.
As I described in Part 1 of this article series, http://mobileenterprisestrategies.blogspot.com/2013/12/a-new-perspective-on-enterprise.html, IT organizations in 2013 realized that the major challenges with implementing enterprise mobility were managing the TCO (total cost of ownership) of mobile apps and upgrading legacy IT systems to support a real-time and mobile-centric landscape. As a result, IT organizations are rethinking their requirements and taking a more strategic view of enterprise mobility and the role it will play. In large enterprises, the word "strategic" is synonymous with slow. It also means taking a deeper look at what needs to change overall in their IT ecosystem to support digital transformation. This kind of in-depth research and analysis often leads CIOs back to their ERP and core system vendors for answers and solutions.
This is not good news for traditional and independent mobile platform vendors. They prefer a market where there is a clean abstraction layer between back-office systems and mobile apps and platforms. If the biggest challenges with enterprise mobility are actually with data integration, orchestration and security, then that opens up a much broader set of competitors and requirements. To compete in that market requires a very different set of skills and plenty of funding.
So where does this lead us? I believe it will lead to large investments in upgrading and replacing legacy systems and infrastructures that are unable to support a real-time, mobile-centric world. This means big money for system integrators, infrastructure players and security solution vendors. It means businesses are going to be hesitant to make big bets on specific mobile platform vendors and on-premise solutions as the technology is moving too fast to be confident in a selection. It means businesses will favor open architectures that permit a vendor agnostic approach to mobility. It means a keen interest in cloud-based mobile solutions and platforms that offer flexibility, minimal commitment, low costs and lightning fast innovation.
2014 looks to be a pivotal and interesting year for enterprise mobility. Stay tuned for the latest.
For more opinions on the direction of enterprise mobility read this article from my colleague Peter Rogers, http://mobileenterprisestrategies.blogspot.com/2013/12/enterprise-mobility-2014-is-going-to.html.
Senior Analyst, Digital Transformation Cognizant
View my profile on LinkedIn
Learn about mobile strategies at MobileEnterpriseStrategies.com
Follow me on Twitter @krbenedict
Browse the Mobile Solution Directory
Join the Linkedin Group Strategic Enterprise Mobility
***Full Disclosure: These are my personal opinions. No company is silly enough to claim them. I am a mobility and digital transformation analyst, consultant and writer. I work with and have worked with many of the companies mentioned in my articles.